NL · EN
Ideas from Ivo November 2024

The Mechanics of Synchronicity

Why direction, field and timing are not coincidence.

The mechanics of synchronicity - light ray through star field

1. The misconception: synchronicity is strange

For most people, synchronicity feels "weird".

  • You think of someone and that person calls.
  • You pick up your phone at the exact moment the right email arrives.
  • You take a different route and meet exactly the person you needed.
  • You're looking for something — and it appears within seconds.

The label is then: bizarre, coincidental, strange, remarkable.

But what if this isn't strange at all?
What if synchronicity is the norm when systems become coherent?

Not airy.
Not paranormal.
But mechanically logical.

2. The basis: three parameters that must align

Synchronicity arises when three things exactly align:

I — observation
You are present, open, not noisy.

V — direction
There is a clear vector, explicit or implicit.

O — field
The potential is active, the bed is open, the system is moving.

When these three come into phase, a phenomenon arises that looks like "surprise",
but in reality is simply field resonance.

Synchronicity is the result of attunement — not of coincidence.

3. The mechanism: field interaction instead of linear causality

In classical causality, the world works like this:

A → B → C → D

Linear, predictable, time-bound.

Synchronicity follows a different logic:

resonance → ordering → event

It's not:
"I think of Pete so Pete calls."

It's:
"I am attuned, so the field becomes sensitive — and events organize themselves around that attunement."

That feels magical, but it is simply the way systems respond when noise disappears.

4. Why timing is so precise

What's remarkable about synchronicity is the timing.
It's never "approximately".
It's always:

  • exactly now
  • exactly this
  • exactly here
  • exactly the one you need
  • exactly the sentence that fits
  • exactly the opening you couldn't yet see

That's not statistical coincidence.
That's field response to a coherent signal.

The field doesn't keep an agenda.
It responds to vibration patterns.

When those become sharp, timing becomes sharp.

5. The role of silence

Synchronicity appears more often:

  • when you're not chasing
  • when you're not forcing
  • when you need nothing for a moment
  • when you're open, not tense
  • when internal noise drops

Why?

Because silence removes noise and strengthens attunement.

Silence = less internal interference.
Less interference = purer signal.
Purer signal = higher chance of field response.

Synchronicity is therefore not a "gift".
It's a response to an internal state.

6. Example from practice: how reality moves along

You see synchronicity in moments of:

  • clear direction
  • open attention
  • high coherence
  • intuitive sharpness
  • decisions without internal friction

Examples:

  • The right boat appears exactly when the idea becomes coherent in your system.
  • The person you need contacts you at exactly that moment.
  • The project moves exactly when you internally choose.
  • In an organization, a pattern opens exactly when you name it.

It looks like coincidence.
But actually reality unfolds around your direction.

7. Why synchronicity is not confirmation but information

It's important to avoid one misconception:

Synchronicity is not meant to prove you right.
It's meant to give information about the direction of the field.

The field says:

  • Here is energy.
  • Here is movement.
  • Something is right here.
  • Something is opening here.

It's not applause.
It's feedback.

A field signal.

8. The working definition within QBM

Within QBM I use this functional definition:

Synchronicity is the external manifestation of internal coherence.
It is the moment when field, observer and direction recognize each other.

It feels like magic, but it works like mechanics.

9. Why this is an idea — not dogma

I don't present this as fact.
Not as truth.
Not as cosmic law.

It's a working hypothesis.
A lens.
A way of looking that consistently returns, is practically applicable and becomes remarkably predictable once you work with field dynamics.

And above all:
it opens the conversation that is hardly being had in science.

What if synchronicity is not the exception, but the rule —
only visible when we become coherent?